Last year was a bad year for the bad guys. Most of the Iraqis responsible for the rape of Iraq are either dead or in custody. Saddam Hussein's 35 year reign of terror ended with his emergence from a hole in the ground with his hands in the air.
Instead of going down with the ship, Saddam went to ground like a rat, and repaid his loyal cadre of murderers and martyrs by proving that no cause is worth dying for.
Read the rest of the article here
Posted by cwilli at January 7, 2004 07:56 PM | TrackBackThe main bad guy still remain in office in washington. you know the one frauding elections, destroying earth climate, holding to the "sall gvt motto" while investing the world's savings into the US military corps ans space program, waging private wars and stufF...
Beware at this rythm ... the US will soon be somebody other countries property.
http://www.bushin30seconds.com/
Please not that even though saddam hussein is far more cruel and evil than George bush he is also far less dangerous on a global scale.
Posted by: DF at January 15, 2004 05:17 AMDF:
If you hate things here sooo much here in the U.S. then maybe YOU should be real man, move here and change things yourself. Put your money where your mouth is because truth is ....YOUR ALL TALK AND NO ACTION SO SHUT THE CRAP UP!!!!!!
LOL!
Your entitled to your opionion DF. No matter how retarded it may be.
Posted by: cwilli at January 15, 2004 11:20 AMWhile Bush was not who I would have voted for in 2000, (but will be this November) I'm somehow more scared of Saddam Hussein than Bush. Hell, I'm more scared of Saddam Hussein than I am of John F'ing Kerry, Richard Gephardt, and Howard Dean put together!
Dean is a hypocrite anyhow. He urged Clinton to "take unilateral action, with or without [ultimately it was without] the support of the UN, in Bosnia." He (along with every other Democrat in congress) supported Bill Clinton's "Operation Desert Fox" (which ultimately never happened, it got cancelled after we lobbed a few cruise missiles and Hussein lied his way out of it...) and supported a 1998 bill that made it into law that regime change in Iraq was the official policy of our government. BTW, that was also the official policy of the Clinton administration from 1997 onward.
Posted by: skywalker at January 15, 2004 06:04 PMfreedom of speech.. he can say whatever he wants
isnt that what you guys want
minimal gov and freedom of speech...
les:
"freedom of speech...he can say whatever he wants"
Who are you specifically talking about? Dean, Kerry, DF? In any case...yes, your right...well, to a degree anyway as on this board Muddy does edit.
"isn't that what you guys want
minimal gov and freedom of speech..."
If your referring to Dean, Kerry and the rest then yes, again your right. Once again though, DF is not appart of our gov., nor is he even an American so freedom of speech does not apply. Also, as far a this board is concerned, Muddy IS the government and he sets the guidlines so (at the risk of sounding redundant) the "freedom of speech" thing is irrelevant.
Perhapes though, I misunderstood?
Posted by: mrs. muddy at January 19, 2004 08:47 PM