America, what a great place to kill babies and call it the right for a woman to choose. To choose the fate of another human being without their voice being heard. [anywhere else it's called Murder]
Hot damn, we're the baby killing capital of the world.[1.3 million every year] Liberals must be crapping themselves with delight every day they wake up here.
How can a nation founded by people calling upon the name of Jesus allow such satanic behavior to happen?? Wait, that's a stupid question, it's called "political correctness or liberalism"
I don't know if this is sad or funny, but if you think about this. Liberals say that it's a woman's right to choose to murder her baby before it's born. Yet it's a crime against humanity to put to death a convicted murder? What kind of screwed up thinking is that?
Story found @ FOXNews.com
Posted by Muddy at June 1, 2004 06:03 PM | TrackBackWhat completely amazes me is that the President just signed into law in April the "Unborn Victims of Violence Act" (also known as "Laci and Conner' s Law") - which, btw, *I* think is a great thing. It basically states (if you *don't* already know) that if a violent crime is taken against a pregnant woman and results in the death of her and her unborn baby then the criminal may be charge with *two* counts of murder. Of course, there is more to this law than that but that's the basics. Plus, I realize this comment of mine *is* taken this posting on a bit of a detour BUT but I brought it up for a point:
You see, the Bill/Law does NOT cover the baby if it is murdered through abortion....so here's *my* question:
Why is it that a baby *is* a baby when he/she is wanted BUT if he/she is NOT wanted then suddenly...it's *not* a baby?
Not to mention: Why is it that the same baby who under this law would be a victum BUT take the same baby *AS it is in the process of being BORN through it's mother's labor* can suddenly be murdered and it is seen NOT as a victum but an "inconvenience" and a "problem".?
As far as this law goes, if you're interrested in reading about it then here's the link:
http://www.nrlc.org/Unborn_Victims/keypointsuvva.html
BTW, the ACLU hates this law even though it *does not* include criminal liability through an abortion simply because they say that this law - which does protect the unborn child from a violent crime - happens to "infringe" on a woman's reproductive rights. Well, I *am* a woman and it DOESN'T "infringe" on my rights and so I really wish the ACLU would shut the **** up, go home and quit trying to speak for me! They're doing a LOUSY job!
Posted by: mrs. muddy at June 3, 2004 12:06 AMHalarity of it is that there was already alot of precedent for charging people with two counts for killing a pregnant woman.
Posted by: skywalker at June 3, 2004 08:01 AM"this law - which does protect the unborn child from a violent crime"
has a law ever prevented someone from commiting a crime? when people are about to do violence i think 'is this against the law?" is about the farthest from their mind.
Posted by: bennyhill1978 at June 4, 2004 02:30 AMbenny: a point which makes me wonder why anyone support guns control.
Posted by: skywalker at June 4, 2004 07:05 AM"has a law ever prevented someone from commiting a crime?"
Well...the laws keep *me* from commiting certain crimes all the time...but *I* also have morals, and a conscience as well.
"when people are about to do violence i think 'is this against the law?" is about the farthest from their mind."
Ummm...yeah....which is why those people are called "criminals".
Posted by: mrs. muddy at June 4, 2004 07:31 AM"Murder before birth is fantastic, Murder after birth is wrong"
This just goes to show you that the liberals have exactly ZERO sense of morality.
Posted by: cwilli at June 5, 2004 11:00 AM